HostCES vs GMT — price, size and safety, side by side
CES (Polygon) vs GMT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
CES vs GMT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CES | GMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2927 | $0.008854 |
| Market cap | — | $25.94M |
| 24h volume | $912.01K | $30.20K |
| Liquidity | $624.98K | $621.92K |
| FDV | $123.53M | $16.23M |
| Holders | 293,912 | 46,298 |
| Age (days) | 494 | 963 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CES measures ~30× the 24h volume of GMT
- CES measures ~6.3× the holder count of GMT
- over the shared window CES moved +13.2% while GMT moved +6.22%
What the data says
CES
CES at 0x1bdf71ede1a4777db1eebe7232bcda20d6fc1610 — listed as WhaleBit — is the utility token of the Meta Whale ecosystem on Polygon, 494 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The snapshot prices no market cap on the row; what it measures instead is $625.0 thousand of tracked pool depth, $445.2 thousand of 24-hour volume and 293,912 holders — a very wide holder count for a token this size, the signature of an ecosystem distributing units to its own members.
The deploy is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can be swapped after deployment — and the ten largest wallets hold 84.1% of the 422.1 million supply. Both are shapes to weigh on an ecosystem token: upgradeability is how a managed project stays maintained, and heavy top concentration is how ecosystem treasuries typically look — the same flag also describes insider-heavy books.
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The September 26, 2026 snapshot prices a $25.9 million market cap against a $16.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $621.9 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CES or GMT?
By tracked market cap: CES (Polygon) measures — and GMT (Polygon) measures $25.94M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CES or GMT?
On the contract checks we publish: CES (Polygon) grades B and GMT (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CES and GMT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CES at +13.2% and GMT at +6.22%.
More comparisons
LAPTOP vs CESJTO vs CESKITE vs CESCES vs APXUSDLAPTOP vs GMTGMT vs APXUSDJTO vs GMTGMT vs AOP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.