HostGMT vs RENBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
GMT (Polygon) vs RENBTC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
GMT vs RENBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GMT | RENBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008854 | $84.88K |
| Market cap | $25.94M | $25.27M |
| 24h volume | $30.20K | $13.86K |
| Liquidity | $621.92K | $440.43K |
| FDV | $16.23M | $490.34K |
| Holders | 46,298 | 1,941 |
| Age (days) | 963 | 1,333 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GMT measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of RENBTC
- GMT measures ~24× the holder count of RENBTC
What the data says
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The September 26, 2026 snapshot prices a $25.9 million market cap against a $16.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $621.9 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
RENBTC
RENBTC at 0xdbf31df14b66535af65aac99c32e9ea844e14501 is the wrapped-bitcoin claim the Ren bridge issued on Polygon — an asset whose issuing bridge wound down years ago, and whose remains still carry a live page in this index. The September 26, 2026 snapshot's silhouette says the service era ended: a local supply of 6 tokens worth $490.3 thousand fully diluted, against a $25.3 million asset-wide market cap that counts every chain's leftovers.
What remains is a residual book: 1,941 wallets still hold a slice, the ten largest hold 96.7% of supply, and $440.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $13.9 thousand of daily volume. The contract is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can still be swapped after deployment, a flag that matters more on an asset whose operator stepped away than on one still maintained.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMT or RENBTC?
By tracked market cap: GMT (Polygon) measures $25.94M and RENBTC (Polygon) measures $25.27M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMT or RENBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: GMT (Polygon) grades B and RENBTC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMT and RENBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GMT at +6.22% and RENBTC at +5.06%.
More comparisons
CES vs GMTLAPTOP vs GMTGMT vs APXUSDJTO vs GMTRENBTC vs UVMRENBTC vs VOLLARRENBTC vs APXUSDDADDY vs RENBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.