NexGHO vs RDNT — price, size and safety, side by side
GHO (Ethereum) vs RDNT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
GHO vs RDNT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| GHO | RDNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $0.0004275 |
| Market cap | $698.88M | $647.15K |
| 24h volume | $6.97M all venues | $19.13K all venues |
| Liquidity | $25.56M | $56.03K |
| FDV | $698.88M | $463.35K |
| Holders | 8,156 | 101,328 |
| Age (days) | 386 | 1,216 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- GHO measures ~1,080× the market cap of RDNT
- GHO measures ~456× the liquidity of RDNT
- GHO measures ~365× the 24h volume of RDNT
- RDNT measures ~12× the holder count of GHO
- over the shared window GHO moved +0.24% while RDNT moved −8.68%
What the data says
GHO
GHO is Aave's native stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited in the Aave protocol, with its monetary policy governed by Aave governance. The contract 0x40d16fc0246ad3160ccc09b8d0d3a2cd28ae6c2f is what our scan tracks: $25.6 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: GHO is overcollateralized-debt stablecoin design — borrowers mint it against Aave collateral, so its backing is the health of Aave's markets rather than a bank account. Peg deviations are the figure to watch: a stablecoin that trades below peg is the market pricing the collateral-and-arbitrage machinery's speed, and GHO's history includes real time spent under a dollar before stabilizers matured.
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $647.2 thousand market cap across 101,328 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $56.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHO or RDNT?
By tracked market cap: GHO (Ethereum) measures $698.88M and RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $647.15K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHO or RDNT?
On the contract checks we publish: GHO (Ethereum) grades B and RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHO and RDNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show GHO at +0.24% and RDNT at −8.68%.
More comparisons
GHO vs CIRBTCGHO vs SUSDEGHO vs VVVGHO vs PAXGRDNT vs TSATRDNT vs POLUNI vs RDNTLINK.E vs RDNT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.