HostEVA vs GMX — price, size and safety, side by side
EVA (Arbitrum) vs GMX (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
EVA vs GMX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| EVA | GMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $45.42 | $8.47 |
| Market cap | — | $88.56M |
| 24h volume | $44.55K | $174.01K |
| Liquidity | $6.25M | $2.61M |
| FDV | $818.08M | $93.01M |
| Holders | 8,567 | 297,779 |
| Age (days) | 802 | 194 |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- EVA measures ~2.4× the liquidity of GMX
- GMX measures ~3.9× the 24h volume of EVA
- GMX measures ~35× the holder count of EVA
- over the shared window EVA moved −0.20% while GMX moved +5.49%
What the data says
EVA
EVA — EverValueCoin at 0x45d9831d8751b2325f3dbf48db748723726e1c8c — is 802 days into an Arbitrum record with a contract that has stayed clean the whole way: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, source is verified, and the creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply.
The market structure splits two ways at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. $6.2 million of liquidity is a serious pool in absolute terms but thin against a $818.1 million cap — size an exit against the pool, not the cap — while the holder side is healthy: 8,567 wallets, with the top ten at about 29.5% — one of the broadest distributions among established tokens this batch.
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices an $88.6 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.0 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $2.6 million of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EVA or GMX?
By tracked market cap: EVA (Arbitrum) measures — and GMX (Arbitrum) measures $88.56M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EVA or GMX?
On the contract checks we publish: EVA (Arbitrum) grades A and GMX (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EVA and GMX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show EVA at −0.20% and GMX at +5.49%.
More comparisons
EVA vs STONKEVA vs BNC4BONK vs EVAEVA vs EUSXGMX vs SYRUPUSDCGMX vs NVDABHYUSD vs GMXKMNO vs GMX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.