HostEMO vs WAMONUSDT0 — price, size and safety, side by side
EMO (Monad) vs WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
EMO vs WAMONUSDT0 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| EMO | WAMONUSDT0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0008896 | $1.01 |
| Market cap | $889.62K | — |
| 24h volume | $3.81K | $12.41K |
| Liquidity | $51.76K | $32.87K |
| FDV | $887.24K | $2.74 |
| Holders | 6,254 | 8 |
| Age (days) | 298 | 47 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- EMO measures ~1.6× the liquidity of WAMONUSDT0
- WAMONUSDT0 measures ~3.3× the 24h volume of EMO
- EMO measures ~782× the holder count of WAMONUSDT0
What the data says
EMO
EMO at 0x81a224f8a62f52bde942dbf23a56df77a10b7777 — deployed under the name "emonad" — is a Monad community token 298 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at an $889.6 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep against the small cap: $51.8 thousand of tracked depth on $7.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — a proportionate pool with a quiet tape. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
WAMONUSDT0
WAMONUSDT0 is Aave's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the interest-bearing receipt for USDT0 supplied into Aave's Monad market, where USDT0 is Tether's omnichain dollar built on LayerZero rails. The deployment 0x5e7109a755fd2b86361f95065cde07fbab50ca1d is the receipt contract; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $33 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics stack two layers: the holder owns a claim on USDT0 in Aave (lending yield plus Aave's solvency assumptions) and USDT0 is itself a claim on Tether's reserve routed through LayerZero's bridge — three hops from dollars in a bank. On a new chain, wrapped-receipt depth this early is the chain's money-market actually forming.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EMO or WAMONUSDT0?
By tracked market cap: EMO (Monad) measures $889.62K and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EMO or WAMONUSDT0?
On the contract checks we publish: EMO (Monad) grades A and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EMO and WAMONUSDT0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show EMO at +1.44% and WAMONUSDT0 at +0.47%.
More comparisons
DEGEN vs EMOIO vs EMOEMO vs TQQQXASS vs EMOWAMONUSDT0 vs LADYBUGSCOUT vs WAMONUSDT0EDWIN vs WAMONUSDT0BEENZ vs WAMONUSDT0
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.