HostEMO vs TQQQX — price, size and safety, side by side
EMO (Monad) vs TQQQX (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
EMO vs TQQQX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| EMO | TQQQX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0008896 | $79.30 |
| Market cap | $889.62K | $45.65M |
| 24h volume | $3.81K | $5.99K |
| Liquidity | $51.76K | $51.67K |
| FDV | $887.24K | $45.65M |
| Holders | 6,254 | 725 |
| Age (days) | 298 | — |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- TQQQX measures ~51× the market cap of EMO
- TQQQX measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of EMO
- EMO measures ~8.6× the holder count of TQQQX
What the data says
EMO
EMO at 0x81a224f8a62f52bde942dbf23a56df77a10b7777 — deployed under the name "emonad" — is a Monad community token 298 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at an $889.6 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep against the small cap: $51.8 thousand of tracked depth on $7.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — a proportionate pool with a quiet tape. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
TQQQX
TQQQX is the xStock for TQQQ — a tokenized claim on a 3x daily-leveraged Nasdaq-100 ETF, which makes it the most aggressive instrument in the xStock family. The mint XsjQP3iMAaQ3kQScQKthQpx9ALRbjKAjQtHg6TFomoc is what our scan tracks: $45.6 million market cap, $52 thousand of liquidity and 725 holders as of September 26, 2026.
Two honest warnings stack here. The family one: issuer custody plus after-hours quoting. The product one is bigger: TQQQ resets its leverage daily, so the tokenized claim inherits volatility decay — over choppy multi-week stretches it can underperform naive 3x expectations even when the index ends flat. A tokenized leveraged ETF is a trading instrument, not a hold; the cap figures describe supply, not suitability.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EMO or TQQQX?
By tracked market cap: EMO (Monad) measures $889.62K and TQQQX (Solana) measures $45.65M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EMO or TQQQX?
On the contract checks we publish: EMO (Monad) grades A and TQQQX (Solana) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EMO and TQQQX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show EMO at +1.44% and TQQQX at +1.20%.
More comparisons
DEGEN vs EMOIO vs EMOASS vs EMOINFRA vs EMODEGEN vs TQQQXIO vs TQQQXASS vs TQQQXINFRA vs TQQQX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.