HostIO vs TQQQX — price, size and safety, side by side
IO (Solana) vs TQQQX (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
IO vs TQQQX — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| IO | TQQQX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.168 | $79.30 |
| Market cap | $65.86M | $45.65M |
| 24h volume | $193.92K | $5.99K |
| Liquidity | $51.83K | $51.67K |
| FDV | $132.22M | $45.65M |
| Holders | 85,594 | 725 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- IO measures ~32× the 24h volume of TQQQX
- IO measures ~118× the holder count of TQQQX
- over the shared window IO moved +20.3% while TQQQX moved +9.47%
What the data says
IO
IO is the token of io.net, the decentralized GPU-compute network that was one of 2024's headline Solana launches. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $65.9 million of circulating market capitalization across 85,594 holders on mint BZLbGTNCSFfoth2GYDtwr7e4imWzpR5jqcUuGEwr646K — with fully diluted value near $132.2 million, meaning over half of eventual supply still sits outside the float on vesting schedules.
That FDV gap is the first thing a buyer should price: emissions and unlocks arrive continuously in a token like this, and today's market cap competes with tomorrow's supply. It is a tokenomics fact, not a contract fault — the contract itself reads clean, with mint and freeze authorities both confirmed revoked in the snapshot.
TQQQX
TQQQX is the xStock for TQQQ — a tokenized claim on a 3x daily-leveraged Nasdaq-100 ETF, which makes it the most aggressive instrument in the xStock family. The mint XsjQP3iMAaQ3kQScQKthQpx9ALRbjKAjQtHg6TFomoc is what our scan tracks: $45.6 million market cap, $52 thousand of liquidity and 725 holders as of September 26, 2026.
Two honest warnings stack here. The family one: issuer custody plus after-hours quoting. The product one is bigger: TQQQ resets its leverage daily, so the tokenized claim inherits volatility decay — over choppy multi-week stretches it can underperform naive 3x expectations even when the index ends flat. A tokenized leveraged ETF is a trading instrument, not a hold; the cap figures describe supply, not suitability.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IO or TQQQX?
By tracked market cap: IO (Solana) measures $65.86M and TQQQX (Solana) measures $45.65M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IO or TQQQX?
On the contract checks we publish: IO (Solana) grades A and TQQQX (Solana) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IO and TQQQX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show IO at +20.3% and TQQQX at +9.47%.
More comparisons
ASS vs IOIO vs DEGENINFRA vs IOIO vs EMOEMO vs TQQQXDEGEN vs TQQQXASS vs TQQQXINFRA vs TQQQX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.