HostSCOUT vs WAMONUSDT0 — price, size and safety, side by side
SCOUT (Solana) vs WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SCOUT vs WAMONUSDT0 — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| SCOUT | WAMONUSDT0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00005812 | $1.01 |
| Market cap | $57.22K | — |
| 24h volume | $59.34 | $12.41K |
| Liquidity | $32.88K | $32.87K |
| FDV | $57.22K | $2.74 |
| Holders | 12,261 | 8 |
| Age (days) | — | 47 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- WAMONUSDT0 measures ~209× the 24h volume of SCOUT
- SCOUT measures ~1,533× the holder count of WAMONUSDT0
- over the shared window SCOUT moved +20.6% while WAMONUSDT0 moved +0.59%
What the data says
SCOUT
SCOUT — "Scoutly AI" on Solana, mint GLPdQwGtjcynj3RLraenPeR9v1REnpdyuciPBpVipump — is an AI-scout themed token with real domains (scoutly.gg) and a 12,261-wallet file against a $57 thousand market cap.
The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows a $26.3 thousand pool — over half the cap is backing liquidity, an unusually deep ratio for the tier — against ~$0.27 of daily volume. Mint and freeze are both revoked.
WAMONUSDT0
WAMONUSDT0 is Aave's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the interest-bearing receipt for USDT0 supplied into Aave's Monad market, where USDT0 is Tether's omnichain dollar built on LayerZero rails. The deployment 0x5e7109a755fd2b86361f95065cde07fbab50ca1d is the receipt contract; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $33 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics stack two layers: the holder owns a claim on USDT0 in Aave (lending yield plus Aave's solvency assumptions) and USDT0 is itself a claim on Tether's reserve routed through LayerZero's bridge — three hops from dollars in a bank. On a new chain, wrapped-receipt depth this early is the chain's money-market actually forming.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SCOUT or WAMONUSDT0?
By tracked market cap: SCOUT (Solana) measures $57.22K and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SCOUT or WAMONUSDT0?
On the contract checks we publish: SCOUT (Solana) grades A and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SCOUT and WAMONUSDT0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show SCOUT at +20.6% and WAMONUSDT0 at +0.59%.
More comparisons
SCOUT vs LADYBUGEDWIN vs SCOUTBEENZ vs SCOUTSCOUT vs BROSWAMONUSDT0 vs LADYBUGEDWIN vs WAMONUSDT0BEENZ vs WAMONUSDT0WAMONUSDT0 vs BROS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.