Host一 vs EVAA — price, size and safety, side by side
一 (BNB Chain) vs EVAA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
一 vs EVAA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 一 | EVAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004247 | $0.6877 |
| Market cap | $3.39M | $4.46M |
| 24h volume | $1.55M | $1.11M |
| Liquidity | $172.97K | $129.44K |
| FDV | $4.26M | $20.34M |
| Holders | 74,515 | 25,533 |
| Age (days) | 249 | 354 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- 一 measures ~2.9× the holder count of EVAA
- over the shared window 一 moved −15.6% while EVAA moved +1.42%
What the data says
一
一 — the name is the Chinese character for "one" — at 0xef91c1eae97edcd429a5ad197753a6c3e4214444 is 249 days into a BNB Chain record, 74,515 wallets holding a $3.4 million book at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The snapshot's rare quality is in the spread: the ten largest wallets hold about 9.8% of supply — the broadest top-10 distribution in this batch by a distance — while the creator wallet holds under 0.01%. The contract cannot mint new supply and cannot pause or blacklist transfers, and its source is verified. The flagged item is modest liquidity: $173 thousand of tracked depth against a roughly $1.5-million daily tape — workable, but thin enough that size moves the price.
EVAA
EVAA at 0xaa036928c9c0df07d525b55ea8ee690bb5a628c1 is a BNB Chain deployment of the EVAA lending protocol's token, 354 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $4.5 million market cap prices barely a fifth of the $20.3 million fully-diluted figure on 30.0 million units.
The book is workable and the tape is loud: $129.4 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself nearly ten times daily, routed flow far above the book. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 一 or EVAA?
By tracked market cap: 一 (BNB Chain) measures $3.39M and EVAA (BNB Chain) measures $4.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 一 or EVAA?
On the contract checks we publish: 一 (BNB Chain) grades A and EVAA (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 一 and EVAA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 一 at −15.6% and EVAA at +1.42%.
More comparisons
一 vs CHIP一 vs PEPECAT一 vs ZRO一 vs LOCKINKET vs EVAAESP vs EVAABMT vs EVAAEVAA vs ALTSZN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.