Host一 vs CHIP — price, size and safety, side by side
一 (BNB Chain) vs CHIP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
一 vs CHIP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| 一 | CHIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004247 | $0.04748 |
| Market cap | $3.39M | $98.75M |
| 24h volume | $1.55M | $810.21K |
| Liquidity | $172.97K | $470.85K |
| FDV | $4.26M | $493.74M |
| Holders | 74,515 | 5,600 |
| Age (days) | 249 | 153 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~29× the market cap of 一
- CHIP measures ~2.7× the liquidity of 一
- 一 measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of CHIP
- 一 measures ~13× the holder count of CHIP
What the data says
一
一 — the name is the Chinese character for "one" — at 0xef91c1eae97edcd429a5ad197753a6c3e4214444 is 249 days into a BNB Chain record, 74,515 wallets holding a $3.4 million book at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The snapshot's rare quality is in the spread: the ten largest wallets hold about 9.8% of supply — the broadest top-10 distribution in this batch by a distance — while the creator wallet holds under 0.01%. The contract cannot mint new supply and cannot pause or blacklist transfers, and its source is verified. The flagged item is modest liquidity: $173 thousand of tracked depth against a roughly $1.5-million daily tape — workable, but thin enough that size moves the price.
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $471 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 一 or CHIP?
By tracked market cap: 一 (BNB Chain) measures $3.39M and CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $98.75M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 一 or CHIP?
On the contract checks we publish: 一 (BNB Chain) grades A and CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 一 and CHIP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show 一 at 0.00% and CHIP at +1.73%.
More comparisons
一 vs PEPECAT一 vs ZRO一 vs LOCKIN一 vs DAICHIP vs METACCHIP vs BEMFLUID vs CHIPAUDIO vs CHIP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.