Host龙虾 vs BANANA — price, size and safety, side by side
龙虾 (BNB Chain) vs BANANA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
龙虾 vs BANANA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 龙虾 | BANANA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1034 | $0.008057 |
| Market cap | $255.30M | $78.51M |
| 24h volume | $6.84M | $1.77M |
| Liquidity | $2.46M | $2.12M |
| FDV | $255.30M | $78.07M |
| Holders | 90,082 | 161,877 |
| Age (days) | 206 | 672 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 龙虾 measures ~3.3× the market cap of BANANA
- 龙虾 measures ~3.9× the 24h volume of BANANA
- BANANA measures ~1.8× the holder count of 龙虾
- over the shared window 龙虾 moved −60.1% while BANANA moved +2.79%
What the data says
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $255.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $2.5 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
BANANA
$BANANA at 0x3d4f0513e8a29669b960f9dbca61861548a9a760 — Banana For Scale — is a BNB Chain community token 672 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $78.5 million market cap across a 10.0 billion supply.
The book is workable but not the deep kind: $2.1 million of tracked pool depth on $1.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape that nearly cycles the pool daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than a claim this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 龙虾 or BANANA?
By tracked market cap: 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $255.30M and BANANA (BNB Chain) measures $78.51M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 龙虾 or BANANA?
On the contract checks we publish: 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A and BANANA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 龙虾 and BANANA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 龙虾 at −60.1% and BANANA at +2.79%.
More comparisons
龙虾 vs SKHYSURPLUS vs 龙虾龙虾 vs ALETH龙虾 vs SAVAXZEC vs BANANAQQQX vs BANANASDOLA vs BANANABANANA vs DAI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.