HostEARNAUSD vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
EARNAUSD (Monad) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
EARNAUSD vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| EARNAUSD | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.10 | $0.000003199 |
| Market cap | $30.07M | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $212.52 | $165.56 |
| Liquidity | $2.84K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $30.07M | $3.20K |
| Holders | 2,626 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | 302 | 298 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- EARNAUSD measures ~8,568× the market cap of MCA
- over the shared window EARNAUSD moved 0.00% while MCA moved +9.69%
What the data says
EARNAUSD
One detail on EARNAUSD didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-26 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where EARNAUSD stands today: $2.84K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 2,626 and a maturing record at 302 days as of 2026-09-26. Set the $2.84K pool against roughly $30.07M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 2,626-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
MCA
MCA gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On the market side, MCA brings deep liquidity of $2.30K, a holder base of 2,837 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $2.30K pool stands up well to a ~$3.51K cap — depth like that means MCA absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 2,837-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EARNAUSD or MCA?
By tracked market cap: EARNAUSD (Monad) measures $30.07M and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EARNAUSD or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: EARNAUSD (Monad) grades B and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EARNAUSD and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show EARNAUSD at 0.00% and MCA at +9.69%.
More comparisons
SONIC vs EARNAUSDEARNAUSD vs CVXXEARNAUSD vs GMTEARNAUSD vs NVDAONMCA vs SUSDEMCA vs HXROSTB vs MCAELIZAOS vs MCA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.