HostDEBIT vs AKE — price, size and safety, side by side
DEBIT (BNB Chain) vs AKE (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
DEBIT vs AKE — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| DEBIT | AKE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.01 | $0.03345 |
| Market cap | $34.70M | $762.58M |
| 24h volume | $49.89M | $3.94M |
| Liquidity | $1.19M | $1.09M |
| FDV | $201.49M | $3.35B |
| Holders | 14,209 | 43,179 |
| Age (days) | 28 | 397 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- AKE measures ~22× the market cap of DEBIT
- DEBIT measures ~13× the 24h volume of AKE
- AKE measures ~3.0× the holder count of DEBIT
- over the shared window DEBIT moved −27.3% while AKE moved +17.5%
What the data says
DEBIT
DEBIT — trading under the project name Teller on BNB Smart Chain, at 0x66661c7229901f568f16bd1551b3ba826f83ce49 — shows $1.2 million of liquidity and roughly $19.2 million of 24-hour volume in the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
Two things want separating here. The name: "Teller" is associated with a lending protocol that has operated across chains, and a DEBIT symbol on BSC is not automatically that project — the address above is the identity, and any claim of protocol lineage needs verifying at the contract, not the ticker. The numbers: near 7x daily turnover against liquidity is hot speculation by any standard, whatever the project behind it is.
AKE
AKE on BNB Smart Chain — 0x2c3a8ee94ddd97244a93bc48298f97d2c412f7db — is the elder of this index slice at roughly 13 months of tracked age, holding $1.1 million of liquidity in the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
Age changes the read on everything else. A contract that has survived thirteen months of BSC trading has passed the window where most outright scam contracts die — but longevity is not vindication, and the roughly $18 million of 24-hour volume against $1.1 million of liquidity is the same hot-turnover signature seen across this cohort. Sustained high turnover on a mature token reads as an actively market-made asset: tradeable, and priced by flow rather than by fundamentals this snapshot can see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DEBIT or AKE?
By tracked market cap: DEBIT (BNB Chain) measures $34.70M and AKE (BNB Chain) measures $762.58M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DEBIT or AKE?
On the contract checks we publish: DEBIT (BNB Chain) grades C and AKE (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DEBIT and AKE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show DEBIT at −27.3% and AKE at +17.5%.
More comparisons
DEBIT vs DORYH vs DEBITCTM vs DEBITDEBIT vs PENDLEAKE vs CREDAKE vs LDOAKE vs AURAAKE vs BAS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.