HostCRV vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
CRV (Arbitrum) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
CRV vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CRV | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3519 | $9.63 |
| Market cap | $552.13M | $5.60B |
| 24h volume | $130.97K | $5.14M |
| Liquidity | $414.92K | $25.55M |
| FDV | $6.89M | $8.01B |
| Holders | 29,093 | 382,165 |
| Age (days) | 1,687 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~10× the market cap of CRV
- UNI measures ~62× the liquidity of CRV
- UNI measures ~39× the 24h volume of CRV
- UNI measures ~13× the holder count of CRV
- over the shared window CRV moved −1.88% while UNI moved +6.71%
What the data says
CRV
CRV at 0x11cdb42b0eb46d95f990bedd4695a6e3fa034978 — Curve DAO Token — is the bridged Arbitrum deployment of the Curve protocol's governance asset, 1,687 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $552.1 million market cap towers over the $6.9 million fully-diluted figure on 19.6 million local units.
The local book is thin against the headline: $414.9 thousand of tracked depth on $291.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a layer-two slice that moves with flow rather than holding a primary pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRV or UNI?
By tracked market cap: CRV (Arbitrum) measures $552.13M and UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRV or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: CRV (Arbitrum) grades B and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRV and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CRV at −1.88% and UNI at +6.71%.
More comparisons
CRV vs SUPERCRV vs VELVETHIMS vs CRVPRL vs CRVUNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.