HostCHIP vs PEPECAT — price, size and safety, side by side
CHIP (Arbitrum) vs PEPECAT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
CHIP vs PEPECAT — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| CHIP | PEPECAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04748 | $0.007748 |
| Market cap | $98.75M | $7.20M |
| 24h volume | $810.21K | $1.86K |
| Liquidity | $470.85K | $172.28K |
| FDV | $493.74M | $7.20M |
| Holders | 5,600 | 2,398 |
| Age (days) | 153 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~14× the market cap of PEPECAT
- CHIP measures ~2.7× the liquidity of PEPECAT
- CHIP measures ~435× the 24h volume of PEPECAT
- CHIP measures ~2.3× the holder count of PEPECAT
- over the shared window CHIP moved +69.0% while PEPECAT moved +25.2%
What the data says
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $471 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
PEPECAT
PEPECAT — a Solana meme fusing the two most overworked animal brands in crypto (pepe + cat), at mint CRAMvzDsSpXYsFpcoDr6vFLJMBeftez1E7277xwPpump. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $172 thousand of liquidity and roughly 2,398 holders.
Hybrid-brand memes trade on borrowed recognition from both parents — which is real attention value, and also the honest ceiling: the joke is the mashup, and once seen it's seen. Standard meme economics: no cash flows.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CHIP or PEPECAT?
By tracked market cap: CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $98.75M and PEPECAT (Solana) measures $7.20M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CHIP or PEPECAT?
On the contract checks we publish: CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B and PEPECAT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CHIP and PEPECAT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show CHIP at +69.0% and PEPECAT at +25.2%.
More comparisons
CHIP vs METACCHIP vs BEMFLUID vs CHIPAUDIO vs CHIP一 vs PEPECATPEPECAT vs ZROPEPECAT vs LOCKINPEPECAT vs DAI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.