HostCHIP vs MEOW — price, size and safety, side by side
CHIP (Arbitrum) vs MEOW (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
CHIP vs MEOW — normalized performance, 2026-08-17 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CHIP | MEOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04748 | $0.0009416 |
| Market cap | $98.75M | $33.22K |
| 24h volume | $810.21K | $3.09M |
| Liquidity | $470.85K | $90.48K |
| FDV | $493.74M | $33.22K |
| Holders | 5,600 | 2,634 |
| Age (days) | 153 | 300 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~2,973× the market cap of MEOW
- CHIP measures ~5.2× the liquidity of MEOW
- MEOW measures ~3.8× the 24h volume of CHIP
- CHIP measures ~2.1× the holder count of MEOW
- over the shared window CHIP moved +78.3% while MEOW moved 0.00%
What the data says
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $471 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
MEOW
MEOW — Kittehcoin on Base, contract 0x03ee11923326d54a580af44ec633f1cdcb414632 — is the index's oldest specimen: 300 days old at its September 26, 2026 snapshot, an age almost nothing in the churn cohort reaches. $90 thousand of liquidity and $3.1 million of daily volume — a 34x turnover.
"Kittehcoin" is a resurrection name — an early-2014-era cat coin of the same name existed back when doge was new, making this a heritage revival: someone relaunched crypto's oldest meme name on Base. Three hundred days of survival plus $3M daily volume says the revival found a market.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CHIP or MEOW?
By tracked market cap: CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $98.75M and MEOW (Base) measures $33.22K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CHIP or MEOW?
On the contract checks we publish: CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B and MEOW (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CHIP and MEOW performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-17 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CHIP at +78.3% and MEOW at 0.00%.
More comparisons
CHIP vs METACCHIP vs BEMFLUID vs CHIPAUDIO vs CHIP401JK vs MEOWAVO vs MEOWFWDI vs MEOWMEOW vs USO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-17→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.