HostCES vs RENBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
CES (Polygon) vs RENBTC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
CES vs RENBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CES | RENBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2927 | $84.88K |
| Market cap | — | $25.27M |
| 24h volume | $912.01K | $13.86K |
| Liquidity | $624.98K | $440.43K |
| FDV | $123.53M | $490.34K |
| Holders | 293,912 | 1,941 |
| Age (days) | 494 | 1,333 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CES measures ~66× the 24h volume of RENBTC
- CES measures ~151× the holder count of RENBTC
- over the shared window CES moved +13.2% while RENBTC moved +5.06%
What the data says
CES
CES at 0x1bdf71ede1a4777db1eebe7232bcda20d6fc1610 — listed as WhaleBit — is the utility token of the Meta Whale ecosystem on Polygon, 494 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The snapshot prices no market cap on the row; what it measures instead is $625.0 thousand of tracked pool depth, $445.2 thousand of 24-hour volume and 293,912 holders — a very wide holder count for a token this size, the signature of an ecosystem distributing units to its own members.
The deploy is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can be swapped after deployment — and the ten largest wallets hold 84.1% of the 422.1 million supply. Both are shapes to weigh on an ecosystem token: upgradeability is how a managed project stays maintained, and heavy top concentration is how ecosystem treasuries typically look — the same flag also describes insider-heavy books.
RENBTC
RENBTC at 0xdbf31df14b66535af65aac99c32e9ea844e14501 is the wrapped-bitcoin claim the Ren bridge issued on Polygon — an asset whose issuing bridge wound down years ago, and whose remains still carry a live page in this index. The September 26, 2026 snapshot's silhouette says the service era ended: a local supply of 6 tokens worth $490.3 thousand fully diluted, against a $25.3 million asset-wide market cap that counts every chain's leftovers.
What remains is a residual book: 1,941 wallets still hold a slice, the ten largest hold 96.7% of supply, and $440.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $13.9 thousand of daily volume. The contract is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can still be swapped after deployment, a flag that matters more on an asset whose operator stepped away than on one still maintained.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CES or RENBTC?
By tracked market cap: CES (Polygon) measures — and RENBTC (Polygon) measures $25.27M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CES or RENBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: CES (Polygon) grades B and RENBTC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CES and RENBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CES at +13.2% and RENBTC at +5.06%.
More comparisons
CES vs GMTLAPTOP vs CESJTO vs CESKITE vs CESRENBTC vs UVMRENBTC vs VOLLARRENBTC vs APXUSDDADDY vs RENBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.