HostBOB vs 143 — price, size and safety, side by side
BOB (Monad) vs 143 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
BOB vs 143 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| BOB | 143 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00007848 | $0.00003587 |
| Market cap | $79.43K | $41.30K |
| 24h volume | $958.97 | $513.70 |
| Liquidity | $16.27K | $9.46K |
| FDV | $79.42K | $41.30K |
| Holders | 2,921 | 1,507 |
| Age (days) | 158 | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- BOB measures ~1.9× the market cap of 143
- BOB measures ~1.7× the liquidity of 143
- BOB measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of 143
- BOB measures ~1.9× the holder count of 143
- over the shared window BOB moved −1.19% while 143 moved −14.4%
What the data says
BOB
Right at the foundation, BOB does both of the things you'd hope to see. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and it can't freeze or block transfers, keeping your ability to sell fully open. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On liquidity and holders, BOB shows deep liquidity of $16.27K, 2,921 wallets holding and a maturing 158-day history as of 2026-09-26. The $16.27K pool stands up well to a ~$79.43K cap — depth like that means BOB absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 2,921 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BOB or 143?
By tracked market cap: BOB (Monad) measures $79.43K and 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BOB or 143?
On the contract checks we publish: BOB (Monad) grades A and 143 (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BOB and 143 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show BOB at −1.19% and 143 at −14.4%.
More comparisons
FARTLESS vs BOBGUANO vs BOBBOB vs BASCONLYMARMS vs BOBCUM vs 143AQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143WEETH vs 143
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.