HostB vs GMX — price, size and safety, side by side
B (BNB Chain) vs GMX (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
B vs GMX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| B | GMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1855 | $8.47 |
| Market cap | $210.29M | $88.56M |
| 24h volume | $1.40M | $174.01K |
| Liquidity | $2.66M | $2.61M |
| FDV | $210.16M | $93.01M |
| Holders | 76,844 | 297,779 |
| Age (days) | 494 | 194 |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- B measures ~2.4× the market cap of GMX
- B measures ~8.0× the 24h volume of GMX
- GMX measures ~3.9× the holder count of B
- over the shared window B moved −11.8% while GMX moved +4.16%
What the data says
B
B at 0x6bdcce4a559076e37755a78ce0c06214e59e4444 — the single-letter ticker — is a BNB Chain asset 494 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $210.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
This is the deepest pool in the unwritten queue: $2.7 million of workable tracked depth on $1.4 million of 24-hour volume — a book that genuinely clears. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices an $88.6 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.0 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $2.6 million of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
FAQ
Which is bigger, B or GMX?
By tracked market cap: B (BNB Chain) measures $210.29M and GMX (Arbitrum) measures $88.56M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, B or GMX?
On the contract checks we publish: B (BNB Chain) grades A and GMX (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have B and GMX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show B at −11.8% and GMX at +4.16%.
More comparisons
B vs USDTB vs KMNOB vs HYUSDB vs SYRUPUSDCGMX vs SYRUPUSDCGMX vs NVDABHYUSD vs GMXKMNO vs GMX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.