HostAURA vs AMWBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
AURA (Polygon) vs AMWBTC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
AURA vs AMWBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| AURA | AMWBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.528 | $81.05K |
| Market cap | $4.54M | $5.14M |
| 24h volume | $37.82K | $13.74K |
| Liquidity | $1.08M | $943.43K |
| FDV | $4.94M | $5.03M |
| Holders | 2,700 | 9,807 |
| Age (days) | 88 | 1,518 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- AURA measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of AMWBTC
- AMWBTC measures ~3.6× the holder count of AURA
- over the shared window AURA moved −13.3% while AMWBTC moved +3.57%
What the data says
AURA
AURA — Auralith — is an 88-day-old Polygon token at 0xd9d12f43918363cea1c0b62d16f1f81b8eae91e0, priced at a $4.5 million market cap on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The venue side is the healthiest in this batch relative to size: $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity is deep for a $4.5M cap — a quarter of the valuation sits in the exit book. What isn't measured matters as much: contract controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot and holder distribution wasn't resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $943 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AURA or AMWBTC?
By tracked market cap: AURA (Polygon) measures $4.54M and AMWBTC (Polygon) measures $5.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AURA or AMWBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: AURA (Polygon) grades B and AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AURA and AMWBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show AURA at −13.3% and AMWBTC at +3.57%.
More comparisons
AURA vs BASSUSHI vs AURAAURA vs JOEAURA vs COINXFWOG vs AMWBTCPOOLS vs AMWBTCTOSHI vs AMWBTCCOOL vs AMWBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.