HostSUSHI vs AURA — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSHI (Ethereum) vs AURA (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
SUSHI vs AURA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| SUSHI | AURA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2465 | $0.528 |
| Market cap | $77.24M | $4.54M |
| 24h volume | $753.42K | $37.82K |
| Liquidity | $1.09M | $1.08M |
| FDV | $77.24M | $4.94M |
| Holders | 126,621 | 2,700 |
| Age (days) | 1,042 | 88 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- SUSHI measures ~17× the market cap of AURA
- SUSHI measures ~20× the 24h volume of AURA
- SUSHI measures ~47× the holder count of AURA
What the data says
SUSHI
SUSHI is SushiSwap's token — the exchange that famously vampire-attacked Uniswap's liquidity in 2020 and has run as a multichain DEX brand ever since. The contract 0x6b3595068778dd592e39a122f4f5a5cf09c90fe2 is the canonical mainnet deployment; our September 26, 2026 read shows $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.25 handle.
The honest read: SUSHI is a legacy-major trading a long way below its peak — the protocol still ships (aggregator routing, the v4 work, a broad chain footprint), and xSUSHI staking still routes a share of venue fees, but the token's valuation is a bet that a crowded DEX market leaves room for a fifth-generation contender. The brand is the asset and the ceiling.
AURA
AURA — Auralith — is an 88-day-old Polygon token at 0xd9d12f43918363cea1c0b62d16f1f81b8eae91e0, priced at a $4.5 million market cap on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The venue side is the healthiest in this batch relative to size: $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity is deep for a $4.5M cap — a quarter of the valuation sits in the exit book. What isn't measured matters as much: contract controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot and holder distribution wasn't resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSHI or AURA?
By tracked market cap: SUSHI (Ethereum) measures $77.24M and AURA (Polygon) measures $4.54M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSHI or AURA?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSHI (Ethereum) grades B and AURA (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSHI and AURA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show SUSHI at 0.00% and AURA at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SUSHI vs BASCRED vs SUSHIAKE vs SUSHISUSHI vs JOEAURA vs BASAURA vs JOEAURA vs COINXCRED vs AURA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.