HostCRED vs SUSHI — price, size and safety, side by side
CRED (Solana) vs SUSHI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
CRED vs SUSHI — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27
| CRED | SUSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.6969 | $0.2679 |
| Market cap | $14.14M | $76.81M |
| 24h volume | $261.52K | $105.49K |
| Liquidity | $1.09M | $858.51K |
| FDV | $14.14M | $78.08M |
| Holders | 2,063 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1,042 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SUSHI measures ~5.4× the market cap of CRED
- CRED measures ~2.5× the 24h volume of SUSHI
- over the shared window CRED moved +37.8% while SUSHI moved +8.66%
What the data says
CRED
CRED is Credible Finance's token — a MetaDAO launchpad issue, which you can read off the mint itself: CREDBHvVqREBCAxMihzr8D1nepHMr2gmQoZWpmgGmeta carries the "meta" suffix that marks a futarchy-governed launch, meaning treasury decisions route through prediction markets rather than a founder's multisig. Our September 26, 2026 read shows $14.1 million market cap, $1.1 million of pool liquidity, and 2,063 holders.
The honest note: the launchpad governance is a real structural difference — treasury moves need a market to approve them — but the holder count is thin for the cap, which is the number that decides whether this is a community or a book. Watch distribution before size.
SUSHI
SUSHI is SushiSwap's token — the exchange that famously vampire-attacked Uniswap's liquidity in 2020 and has run as a multichain DEX brand ever since. The contract 0x6b3595068778dd592e39a122f4f5a5cf09c90fe2 is the canonical mainnet deployment; our September 27, 2026 read shows $859 thousand of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.25 handle.
The honest read: SUSHI is a legacy-major trading a long way below its peak — the protocol still ships (aggregator routing, the v4 work, a broad chain footprint), and xSUSHI staking still routes a share of venue fees, but the token's valuation is a bet that a crowded DEX market leaves room for a fifth-generation contender. The brand is the asset and the ceiling.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRED or SUSHI?
By tracked market cap: CRED (Solana) measures $14.14M and SUSHI (Ethereum) measures $76.81M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRED or SUSHI?
On the contract checks we publish: CRED (Solana) grades A and SUSHI (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRED and SUSHI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27, the measured snapshots show CRED at +37.8% and SUSHI at +8.66%.
More comparisons
AKE vs CREDCRED vs LDOCRED vs AURACRED vs BASSUSHI vs SYBTCSUSHI vs OPENAIAURA vs SUSHISUSHI vs LINK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.