HostSUSHI vs LINK — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSHI (Ethereum) vs LINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
SUSHI vs LINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SUSHI | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2679 | $14.30 |
| Market cap | $76.81M | $9.76B |
| 24h volume | $105.49K | $2.58M |
| Liquidity | $858.51K | $24.03M |
| FDV | $78.08M | $13.05B |
| Holders | — | 919,439 |
| Age (days) | 1,042 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~127× the market cap of SUSHI
- LINK measures ~28× the liquidity of SUSHI
- LINK measures ~24× the 24h volume of SUSHI
What the data says
SUSHI
SUSHI is SushiSwap's token — the exchange that famously vampire-attacked Uniswap's liquidity in 2020 and has run as a multichain DEX brand ever since. The contract 0x6b3595068778dd592e39a122f4f5a5cf09c90fe2 is the canonical mainnet deployment; our September 27, 2026 read shows $859 thousand of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.25 handle.
The honest read: SUSHI is a legacy-major trading a long way below its peak — the protocol still ships (aggregator routing, the v4 work, a broad chain footprint), and xSUSHI staking still routes a share of venue fees, but the token's valuation is a bet that a crowded DEX market leaves room for a fifth-generation contender. The brand is the asset and the ceiling.
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSHI or LINK?
By tracked market cap: SUSHI (Ethereum) measures $76.81M and LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.76B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSHI or LINK?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSHI (Ethereum) grades B and LINK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSHI and LINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SUSHI at +10.6% and LINK at +14.4%.
More comparisons
SUSHI vs SYBTCSUSHI vs OPENAIAURA vs SUSHIWSTETH vs SUSHILINK vs USD1ETH vs LINKSUSDE vs LINKLINK vs AAVE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.