NexARB vs PENGU — price, size and safety, side by side
ARB (Arbitrum) vs PENGU (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
ARB vs PENGU — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| ARB | PENGU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1363 | $0.004856 |
| Market cap | $1.16B | $514.95M |
| 24h volume | $224.44M all venues | $111.14M all venues |
| Liquidity | $2.71M | $2.11M |
| FDV | $1.69B | $514.95M |
| Holders | 2,391,070 | 563,555 |
| Age (days) | 1,284 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ARB measures ~2.3× the market cap of PENGU
- ARB measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of PENGU
- ARB measures ~4.2× the holder count of PENGU
- over the shared window ARB moved −5.16% while PENGU moved −41.2%
What the data says
ARB
ARB is Arbitrum's own token — the governance asset of the largest Ethereum L2, the chain most of this index's Arbitrum-side liquidity actually lives on. The deployment 0x912ce59144191c1204e64559fe8253a0e49e6548 is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $2.7 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest asymmetry: ARB's market value rides on the chain it governs being worth governing — the token's thesis is Arbitrum's sequencer revenue, its DAO treasury, and the chain's continued dominance in L2 DeFi, none of which a liquidity snapshot can confirm or deny. What the snapshot does show is that ARB's on-chain depth is concentrated and modest relative to the chain's own TVL — most ARB trades happen off-chain or on the chain's own DEX infrastructure in pairs this index doesn't fully see.
PENGU
PENGU is what happens when an NFT brand outgrows its JPEGs. Pudgy Penguins spent years building the rare thing in crypto — mainstream distribution, from viral GIF packs to toys on retail shelves — and in December 2024 attached a token to that brand with one of the widest airdrops Solana has hosted. As of the November 6, 2026 snapshot, PENGU carries roughly $514.9 million of market capitalization across 563,555 holders at mint 2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv.
The chain-level mechanics read clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Supply is fixed at what exists, and no authority can freeze a wallet out of selling — the two structural failures behind most of the losses this site documents, both absent here. A holder base above half a million wallets, seeded by the airdrop, means ownership is broad in a way most brand tokens never achieve; broad bases don't prevent drawdowns, but they make single-wallet price control much harder.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ARB or PENGU?
By tracked market cap: ARB (Arbitrum) measures $1.16B and PENGU (Solana) measures $514.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ARB or PENGU?
On the contract checks we publish: ARB (Arbitrum) grades B and PENGU (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ARB and PENGU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show ARB at −5.16% and PENGU at −41.2%.
More comparisons
ARB vs PENDLEASTER vs ARBXRP vs ARBARB vs SHIBPENGU vs SHIBPENGU vs CBETHPENGU vs SYRUPUSDCPENGU vs USDT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.