NexARB vs PENDLE — price, size and safety, side by side
ARB (Arbitrum) vs PENDLE (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
ARB vs PENDLE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| ARB | PENDLE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1363 | $1.44 |
| Market cap | $1.16B | $290.30M |
| 24h volume | $224.44M all venues | $52.48M all venues |
| Liquidity | $2.71M | $2.57M |
| FDV | $1.69B | $24.57M |
| Holders | 2,391,070 | 70,319 |
| Age (days) | 1,284 | 1,311 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ARB measures ~4.0× the market cap of PENDLE
- ARB measures ~4.3× the 24h volume of PENDLE
- ARB measures ~34× the holder count of PENDLE
- over the shared window ARB moved −41.2% while PENDLE moved −47.5%
What the data says
ARB
ARB is Arbitrum's own token — the governance asset of the largest Ethereum L2, the chain most of this index's Arbitrum-side liquidity actually lives on. The deployment 0x912ce59144191c1204e64559fe8253a0e49e6548 is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $2.7 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest asymmetry: ARB's market value rides on the chain it governs being worth governing — the token's thesis is Arbitrum's sequencer revenue, its DAO treasury, and the chain's continued dominance in L2 DeFi, none of which a liquidity snapshot can confirm or deny. What the snapshot does show is that ARB's on-chain depth is concentrated and modest relative to the chain's own TVL — most ARB trades happen off-chain or on the chain's own DEX infrastructure in pairs this index doesn't fully see.
PENDLE
PENDLE on Arbitrum at 0x0c880f6761f1af8d9aa9c466984b80dab9a8c9e8 is the bridged deployment of the yield-tokenization protocol's token — the asset behind the principal-and-yield-splitting market that turned fixed yield into a DeFi primitive. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices the Arbitrum-local supply of 14.6 million units at $24.6 million fully diluted, against an asset-wide $290.3 million market cap.
$2.6 million of tracked pool depth on this chain is thin measured the way the depth flag measures — against the asset-wide figure — but functional: $632.8 thousand of 24-hour volume moves through it. The 1,293-day record belongs to a token whose liquidity genuinely spans chains, with Ethereum holding the canonical supply and Arbitrum holding the routed share, so the local book is a window on the market rather than the market itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ARB or PENDLE?
By tracked market cap: ARB (Arbitrum) measures $1.16B and PENDLE (Arbitrum) measures $290.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ARB or PENDLE?
On the contract checks we publish: ARB (Arbitrum) grades B and PENDLE (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ARB and PENDLE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show ARB at −41.2% and PENDLE at −47.5%.
More comparisons
ASTER vs ARBXRP vs ARBARB vs PENGUARB vs SHIBPENDLE vs PENGUPENDLE vs SHIBPENDLE vs CBETHPENDLE vs SYRUPUSDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.