HostAPRMON vs 143 — price, size and safety, side by side
APRMON (Monad) vs 143 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
APRMON vs 143 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| APRMON | 143 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02903 | $0.00003587 |
| Market cap | $670.50K | $41.30K |
| 24h volume | $19.11K | $513.70 |
| Liquidity | $9.95K | $9.46K |
| FDV | $670.74K | $41.30K |
| Holders | 5,017 | 1,507 |
| Age (days) | 293 | 298 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- APRMON measures ~16× the market cap of 143
- APRMON measures ~37× the 24h volume of 143
- APRMON measures ~3.3× the holder count of 143
- over the shared window APRMON moved +3.79% while 143 moved −14.4%
What the data says
APRMON
APRMON — aPriori's Monad liquid-staking token — is one of the first LSTs in this index on Monad: 0x0c65a0bc65a5d819235b71f554d210d3f80e0852, 293 days old on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $670.5 thousand market cap across 5,017 wallets.
The structure flag is the one an LST can't avoid: the token sits behind a proxy, so the receipt logic is upgradeable — normal for staking infrastructure, real nonetheless. The float is fairly concentrated (top ten hold about 68.6%), and the venue is thin — $9.9 thousand of tracked liquidity against the cap, so exits are rationed by the pool, not the code.
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APRMON or 143?
By tracked market cap: APRMON (Monad) measures $670.50K and 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APRMON or 143?
On the contract checks we publish: APRMON (Monad) grades B and 143 (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APRMON and 143 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show APRMON at +3.79% and 143 at −14.4%.
More comparisons
APRMON vs WCTWMTX vs APRMONASTROID vs APRMONAPRMON vs EMINICUM vs 143AQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143WEETH vs 143
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.