HostAPE vs NES — price, size and safety, side by side
APE (Ethereum) vs NES (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
APE vs NES — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| APE | NES | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1584 | $0.0005341 |
| Market cap | $158.40M | $75.57K |
| 24h volume | $90.78K | $71.64 |
| Liquidity | $270.24K | $264.63K |
| FDV | $158.40M | $111.63K |
| Holders | 189,466 | 28,890 |
| Age (days) | — | 50 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- APE measures ~2,096× the market cap of NES
- APE measures ~1,267× the 24h volume of NES
- APE measures ~6.6× the holder count of NES
What the data says
APE
APE passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. It's a reassuring starting point: 100/100 as of 2026-09-27, with the structural risks already off the table.
Looking at the market data, APE shows a $270.24K pool and a holder base of 189,466 as of 2026-09-27. Set the $270.24K pool against roughly $158.40M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 189,466-wallet holder base is a genuine strength on top of that: distribution that broad is hard to manufacture, and it means no single wallet quietly owns the float. Reassuringly, the wallet that created APE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
NES
Nesa (NES) is an AI-inference network token — a small-cap bet on decentralized model serving — at contract 0x230f1e241c621d5af670dad83ebcdd18971e2995. Our September 27, 2026 read shows $265 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AI-inference is a crowded thesis, and the differentiator is never the name — it is whether real inference volume settles through the network and whether the token captures any of it. At this size, treat the claim as unproven until the usage numbers say otherwise.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APE or NES?
By tracked market cap: APE (Ethereum) measures $158.40M and NES (Ethereum) measures $75.57K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APE or NES?
On the contract checks we publish: APE (Ethereum) grades A and NES (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APE and NES performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show APE at 0.00% and NES at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDUC vs APEMYX vs APEBERN vs APEAPE vs BTRNES vs MEBTGMON vs NESNES vs CLAWINJ vs NES
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.