HostANAGO vs 143 — price, size and safety, side by side
ANAGO (Monad) vs 143 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
ANAGO vs 143 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| ANAGO | 143 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00006851 | $0.00003587 |
| Market cap | $61.32K | $41.30K |
| 24h volume | $483.38 | $513.70 |
| Liquidity | $13.35K | $9.46K |
| FDV | $61.32K | $41.30K |
| Holders | 2,774 | 1,507 |
| Age (days) | 163 | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ANAGO measures ~1.8× the holder count of 143
- over the shared window ANAGO moved +11.7% while 143 moved −14.4%
What the data says
ANAGO
ANAGO clears the most important contract test cleanly. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason ANAGO's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-26).
On the trading data, ANAGO shows deep liquidity of $13.35K, a holder base of 2,774 and a maturing record at 163 days as of 2026-09-26. Encouragingly, that $13.35K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $61.32K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 2,774 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ANAGO or 143?
By tracked market cap: ANAGO (Monad) measures $61.32K and 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ANAGO or 143?
On the contract checks we publish: ANAGO (Monad) grades A and 143 (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ANAGO and 143 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ANAGO at +11.7% and 143 at −14.4%.
More comparisons
ANAGO vs CATBATANITA vs ANAGOANAGO vs CIRCLEANAGO vs POPFROGCUM vs 143AQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143WEETH vs 143
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.