Host牛来 vs LONG — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (Base) vs LONG (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
牛来 vs LONG — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| 牛来 | LONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001022 | $0.0001031 |
| Market cap | $294.67K | — |
| 24h volume | $25.77M | $18.28M |
| Liquidity | $9.73M | $5.19M |
| FDV | $294.67K | — |
| Holders | 4,887 | 5,098 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 0 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 牛来 measures ~1.9× the liquidity of LONG
- over the shared window 牛来 moved 0.00% while LONG moved −7.32%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x9daa8aa9a188032d6781715f77feb0adc4f96b07 — is the second of three same-named contracts in this index: $9.7 million of liquidity against roughly $25.8 million of daily volume in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Look at the numbers next to its sibling: $9.725 million of liquidity versus $9.744 million — within two tenths of a percent — and a price within a thousandth of a cent of the other clone. Two contracts holding statistically identical liquidity at an identical price point is not a coincidence of markets; it is one operation running parallel books. Whether that arrangement is a coordinated multi-pool strategy or something less benign, the practical reading is the same: the two clones' fates are linked.
LONG
LONG on Base — contract 0x75da26c86806c261865faa25d80333ec8ee41b07 — was brand-new at its September 26, 2026 snapshot, already carrying $5.2 million of liquidity and $18.3 million of daily volume — a 3.5x pool turnover on day zero.
Numbers that large on a same-day contract describe either a heavily backed launch (a funded team provisioning deep liquidity from the start) or the loudest volume-generation operation in this cohort — and the honest note is that both produce identical snapshot rows. The `b07` address tail matches the vanity-suffix pattern shared by the winning "OpenAI" contracts in this index, suggesting a common launch operation behind the biggest impostor/churn instruments on Base.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or LONG?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (Base) measures $294.67K and LONG (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or LONG?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (Base) grades A and LONG (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and LONG performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at 0.00% and LONG at −7.32%.
More comparisons
牛来 vs 牛来牛来 vs OPENAI牛来 vs USDCWETH vs 牛来MU vs LONGLONG vs ONYCZEC vs LONGLONG vs POPCAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.