Host牛来 vs ZEN — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (Base) vs ZEN (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
牛来 vs ZEN — normalized performance, 2026-08-31 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 牛来 | ZEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000201 | $7.88 |
| Market cap | $276.67K | $146.28M |
| 24h volume | $16.30M | $4.76M |
| Liquidity | $1.98M | $1.44M |
| FDV | $276.67K | $167.58M |
| Holders | 5,108 | 104,424 |
| Age (days) | 12 | 425 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ZEN measures ~529× the market cap of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~3.4× the 24h volume of ZEN
- ZEN measures ~20× the holder count of 牛来
- over the shared window 牛来 moved 0.00% while ZEN moved +86.2%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x96594709ee85e343ad0be181b0f1a68a9b4ebb07 — is the third and smallest of the three same-named contracts: $2.0 million of liquidity and roughly $16.3 million of daily volume in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Where the two larger clones price within a whisker of each other at ~$0.0001, this one trades at a fifth of that — same name, different unit scale, and 8x daily turnover. A smaller clone diverging in price from the mirrored pair reads as the runt of the deployment: whether it is an earlier deployment, a failed clone left running, or a deliberate third book, it is not interchangeable with its siblings and the address is the only identity that matters.
ZEN
ZEN is Horizen's token — a veteran privacy-chain project that migrated its ecosystem onto a Base-settled architecture after years as a standalone chain. The contract 0xf43eb8de897fbc7f2502483b2bef7bb9ea179229 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $1.4 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: ZEN is a legacy-network bet in a new wrapper — the zero-knowledge lineage and once-large validator base are real, and so is the migration risk: projects that replatform are simultaneously conceding the old home couldn't hold them and asking the new one to re-rate them. Watch whether Base-era usage actually follows the token.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or ZEN?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (Base) measures $276.67K and ZEN (Base) measures $146.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or ZEN?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (Base) grades A and ZEN (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and ZEN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-31 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at 0.00% and ZEN at +86.2%.
More comparisons
牛来 vs SOLOLIT vs 牛来牛来 vs SPYBBC vs 牛来ATH vs ZENZEN vs MKRZEN vs TSLAXZEN vs TEL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-31→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.