HostLIT vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
LIT (Ethereum) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
LIT vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LIT | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.75 | $0.0000201 |
| Market cap | $1.26B | $276.67K |
| 24h volume | $2.40M | $16.30M |
| Liquidity | $2.00M | $1.98M |
| FDV | $4.94B | $276.67K |
| Holders | 9,530 | 5,108 |
| Age (days) | 246 | 12 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- LIT measures ~4,537× the market cap of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~6.8× the 24h volume of LIT
- LIT measures ~1.9× the holder count of 牛来
- over the shared window LIT moved +5.79% while 牛来 moved 0.00%
What the data says
LIT
LIT is Lighter's token — the equity of one of the higher-volume perpetual DEXes running, a zk-rollup venue that settles Ethereum-grade while quoting like a centralized exchange. The contract 0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2 is the deployment our scan tracks, at $2.0 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: the venue is real — Lighter has sat near the top of perp-DEX volume rankings — and the question is the standard one for fresh exchange tokens: how much of the venue's economics actually accrue to the token, and what the post-airdrop float looks like as unlocks land. Volume is the claim; the token's claim on it is what to verify.
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x96594709ee85e343ad0be181b0f1a68a9b4ebb07 — is the third and smallest of the three same-named contracts: $2.0 million of liquidity and roughly $16.3 million of daily volume in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Where the two larger clones price within a whisker of each other at ~$0.0001, this one trades at a fifth of that — same name, different unit scale, and 8x daily turnover. A smaller clone diverging in price from the mirrored pair reads as the runt of the deployment: whether it is an earlier deployment, a failed clone left running, or a deliberate third book, it is not interchangeable with its siblings and the address is the only identity that matters.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LIT or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: LIT (Ethereum) measures $1.26B and 牛来 (Base) measures $276.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LIT or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: LIT (Ethereum) grades A and 牛来 (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LIT and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LIT at +5.79% and 牛来 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
BC vs LITLIT vs SOLOLIT vs SPYBLIT vs TROLL牛来 vs SOLO牛来 vs SPYBBC vs 牛来牛来 vs TROLL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.