Host牛来 vs SOLO — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (Base) vs SOLO (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
牛来 vs SOLO — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| 牛来 | SOLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000201 | $0.8742 |
| Market cap | $276.67K | $9.50M |
| 24h volume | $16.30M | $129.30K |
| Liquidity | $1.98M | $1.96M |
| FDV | $276.67K | $23.28M |
| Holders | 5,108 | 3,228 |
| Age (days) | 12 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SOLO measures ~34× the market cap of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~126× the 24h volume of SOLO
- 牛来 measures ~1.6× the holder count of SOLO
- over the shared window 牛来 moved 0.00% while SOLO moved +35.3%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x96594709ee85e343ad0be181b0f1a68a9b4ebb07 — is the third and smallest of the three same-named contracts: $2.0 million of liquidity and roughly $16.3 million of daily volume in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Where the two larger clones price within a whisker of each other at ~$0.0001, this one trades at a fifth of that — same name, different unit scale, and 8x daily turnover. A smaller clone diverging in price from the mirrored pair reads as the runt of the deployment: whether it is an earlier deployment, a failed clone left running, or a deliberate third book, it is not interchangeable with its siblings and the address is the only identity that matters.
SOLO
SOLO (Solomon) is a small-cap Solana token launched through MetaDAO's futarchy launchpad — the "meta"-suffixed mint SoLo9oxzLDpcq1dpqAgMwgce5WqkRDtNXK7EPnbmeta is the launchpad's signature, meaning its issuance and treasury sit under futarchy governance rather than a founder's multisig. Our September 26, 2026 read shows $9.5 million market cap ($23.3 million fully diluted) against $2.0 million of pool liquidity and 3,228 holders.
The honest note: the market-cap-to-FDV gap — over half the supply isn't circulating — is the thing to watch at this size, and futarchy-governed treasuries are a real governance experiment, not a marketing one. A small float under a launchpad structure means the unlock schedule is the chart.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or SOLO?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (Base) measures $276.67K and SOLO (Solana) measures $9.50M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or SOLO?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (Base) grades A and SOLO (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and SOLO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at 0.00% and SOLO at +35.3%.
More comparisons
LIT vs 牛来牛来 vs SPYBBC vs 牛来牛来 vs TROLLSOLO vs SPYBLIT vs SOLOSOLO vs TROLLSOLO vs GITLAWB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.