Host牛来 vs GITLAWB — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (Base) vs GITLAWB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
牛来 vs GITLAWB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 牛来 | GITLAWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000201 | $0.00004567 |
| Market cap | $276.67K | $6.09M |
| 24h volume | $16.30M | $1.50M |
| Liquidity | $1.98M | $1.90M |
| FDV | $276.67K | $6.05M |
| Holders | 5,108 | 11,544 |
| Age (days) | 12 | 194 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- GITLAWB measures ~22× the market cap of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~11× the 24h volume of GITLAWB
- GITLAWB measures ~2.3× the holder count of 牛来
- over the shared window 牛来 moved 0.00% while GITLAWB moved −25.1%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x96594709ee85e343ad0be181b0f1a68a9b4ebb07 — is the third and smallest of the three same-named contracts: $2.0 million of liquidity and roughly $16.3 million of daily volume in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Where the two larger clones price within a whisker of each other at ~$0.0001, this one trades at a fifth of that — same name, different unit scale, and 8x daily turnover. A smaller clone diverging in price from the mirrored pair reads as the runt of the deployment: whether it is an earlier deployment, a failed clone left running, or a deliberate third book, it is not interchangeable with its siblings and the address is the only identity that matters.
GITLAWB
GITLAWB at 0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3 is a Base asset 194 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $6.1 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
The book is unusually liquid for the cap: $1.9 million of tracked depth is deep — nearly a third of the valuation — and the $1.5 million daily volume nearly cycles the whole pool every day, a genuinely active tape rather than a dormant holding. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or GITLAWB?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (Base) measures $276.67K and GITLAWB (Base) measures $6.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or GITLAWB?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (Base) grades A and GITLAWB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and GITLAWB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at 0.00% and GITLAWB at −25.1%.
More comparisons
牛来 vs SOLOLIT vs 牛来牛来 vs SPYBBC vs 牛来GITLAWB vs MONGITLAWB vs NVDACGITLAWB vs FETTROLL vs GITLAWB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.