Host格陵兰岛 vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
格陵兰岛 (BNB Chain) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26T06:07:05 / 2026-09-26.
格陵兰岛 vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| 格陵兰岛 | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000008357 | $0.00002624 |
| Market cap | — | $7.83K |
| 24h volume | $1.36M | $1.35M |
| Liquidity | $370.65K | $345.10K |
| FDV | $8.36M | $26.24M |
| Holders | 1,960 | 1,815,204 |
| Age (days) | 2 | 5 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- 果蝇 measures ~926× the holder count of 格陵兰岛
What the data says
格陵兰岛
神圣格陵兰岛 — "Sacred Greenland," a geopolitics-flavored name — is a two-day-old BNB Chain token at 0x452d4c2971471736f8e840a6f9b0f4789243a08a, priced at a fully diluted $8.4 million across 1,960 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The market side is healthy for a debut: $370.7 thousand of tracked liquidity with $1.4 million of two-day volume, and the top ten hold about 54.4% — a fairly concentrated but not extreme float. The unmeasured side is the caveat: contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 格陵兰岛 or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: 格陵兰岛 (BNB Chain) measures — and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 格陵兰岛 or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: 格陵兰岛 (BNB Chain) grades B and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 格陵兰岛 and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show 格陵兰岛 at 0.00% and 果蝇 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GOHOME vs 格陵兰岛格陵兰岛 vs HAROLDCOQ vs 格陵兰岛Q vs 格陵兰岛HLX vs 果蝇OMFG vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LSK果蝇 vs ORCA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.