Host果蝇 vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
果蝇 (BNB Chain) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
果蝇 vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| 果蝇 | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00002624 | $0.09075 |
| Market cap | $7.83K | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $1.35M | $7.04M |
| Liquidity | $345.10K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $26.24M | $22.90M |
| Holders | 1,815,204 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | 5 | 234 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~31,350× the market cap of 果蝇
- ZAMA measures ~5.2× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~513× the holder count of ZAMA
- over the shared window 果蝇 moved 0.00% while ZAMA moved −9.55%
What the data says
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 果蝇 or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 果蝇 or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 果蝇 and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show 果蝇 at 0.00% and ZAMA at −9.55%.
More comparisons
HLX vs 果蝇OMFG vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LSK果蝇 vs ORCAGM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.