Host果蝇 vs AIN — price, size and safety, side by side
果蝇 (BNB Chain) vs AIN (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
果蝇 vs AIN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| 果蝇 | AIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00002624 | $0.02133 |
| Market cap | $7.83K | $3.95M |
| 24h volume | $1.35M | $67.27K |
| Liquidity | $345.10K | $336.63K |
| FDV | $26.24M | $21.27M |
| Holders | 1,815,204 | 18,094 |
| Age (days) | 5 | 439 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- AIN measures ~505× the market cap of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~20× the 24h volume of AIN
- 果蝇 measures ~100× the holder count of AIN
What the data says
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
AIN
AIN — Infinity Ground AI on BNB Smart Chain, 0x9558a9254890b2a8b057a789f413631b9084f4a3 — is a fourteen-month-old AI-themed token holding $337 thousand of liquidity in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, against roughly $20.0 million of daily volume.
The pairing that matters: 439 days of age with turnover near 18x the pool. Age normally dampens churn — survivors settle into holder bases and quieter books — but AIN runs the opposite profile, the pool cycling its full depth many times daily. That reads as persistent market-maker or desk activity around an established token: the asset is old enough to have a trading history, and active enough that its price is being made, not found.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 果蝇 or AIN?
By tracked market cap: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K and AIN (BNB Chain) measures $3.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 果蝇 or AIN?
On the contract checks we publish: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B and AIN (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 果蝇 and AIN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show 果蝇 at 0.00% and AIN at 0.00%.
More comparisons
HLX vs 果蝇OMFG vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LSK果蝇 vs ORCAAIN vs FARTBOYPOP vs AINAIN vs CBLTCAIN vs LVMON
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.