Host果蝇 vs 蝴蝶人生 — price, size and safety, side by side
果蝇 (BNB Chain) vs 蝴蝶人生 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
果蝇 vs 蝴蝶人生 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| 果蝇 | 蝴蝶人生 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00002624 | $0.01686 |
| Market cap | $7.83K | $20.87M |
| 24h volume | $1.35M | $1.62M |
| Liquidity | $345.10K | $319.98K |
| FDV | $26.24M | $29.45M |
| Holders | 1,815,204 | 68,298 |
| Age (days) | 5 | 30 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- 蝴蝶人生 measures ~2,666× the market cap of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~27× the holder count of 蝴蝶人生
- over the shared window 果蝇 moved 0.00% while 蝴蝶人生 moved −42.8%
What the data says
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
蝴蝶人生
蝴蝶人生 — "butterfly life" — at 0x87ae267002cd1ea0ec86bf3601d4a8ad76a47777 is a 30-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $20.9 million market cap against a $29.4 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is hot for its age: $320.0 thousand of tracked depth on $1.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool five times daily. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 果蝇 or 蝴蝶人生?
By tracked market cap: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K and 蝴蝶人生 (BNB Chain) measures $20.87M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 果蝇 or 蝴蝶人生?
On the contract checks we publish: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B and 蝴蝶人生 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 果蝇 and 蝴蝶人生 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show 果蝇 at 0.00% and 蝴蝶人生 at −42.8%.
More comparisons
HLX vs 果蝇OMFG vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LSK果蝇 vs ORCA蝴蝶人生 vs RETIRE蝴蝶人生 vs MANIFEST蝴蝶人生 vs DKNG蝴蝶人生 vs VERSE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.