Host143 vs SMON — price, size and safety, side by side
143 (Monad) vs SMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
143 vs SMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 143 | SMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003587 | $0.02931 |
| Market cap | $41.30K | $2.23M |
| 24h volume | $513.70 | $159.50 |
| Liquidity | $9.46K | $1.80K |
| FDV | $41.30K | $2.23M |
| Holders | 1,507 | 4,846 |
| Age (days) | 298 | 301 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SMON measures ~54× the market cap of 143
- 143 measures ~5.3× the liquidity of SMON
- 143 measures ~3.2× the 24h volume of SMON
- SMON measures ~3.2× the holder count of 143
- over the shared window 143 moved −14.4% while SMON moved −0.10%
What the data says
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
SMON
There's a small gap on this page — SMON's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-09-26. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, SMON carries thin liquidity of $1.80K, a holder base of 4,846 and 301 days old as of 2026-09-26. Set the $1.80K pool against roughly $2.23M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. 4,846 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 143 or SMON?
By tracked market cap: 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K and SMON (Monad) measures $2.23M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 143 or SMON?
On the contract checks we publish: 143 (Monad) grades A and SMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 143 and SMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 143 at −14.4% and SMON at −0.10%.
More comparisons
CUM vs 143AQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143WEETH vs 143NVOX vs SMONGOOD vs SMONSOLID vs SMONSMON vs ACS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.