Host143 vs ATTN — price, size and safety, side by side
143 (Monad) vs ATTN (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
143 vs ATTN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 143 | ATTN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003587 | $0.01478 |
| Market cap | $41.30K | $1.49M |
| 24h volume | $513.70 | $17.59K |
| Liquidity | $9.46K | $78.33K |
| FDV | $41.30K | $1.49M |
| Holders | 1,507 | 972 |
| Age (days) | 298 | — |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ATTN measures ~36× the market cap of 143
- ATTN measures ~8.3× the liquidity of 143
- ATTN measures ~34× the 24h volume of 143
- 143 measures ~1.6× the holder count of ATTN
- over the shared window 143 moved −14.4% while ATTN moved −24.3%
What the data says
143
143 at 0x3842751a46d23b41a47e702473dff316e6237777 — name, ticker and digits all reading as one — is a 298-day-old Monad book priced at a $41.3 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the tiny float and the tape is nearly silent: $9.5 thousand of tracked depth on $514 of 24-hour volume, held by 1,507 wallets with the top ten holding 36.6 percent of supply. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy.
ATTN
ATTN — Attention Mine — is a Solana attention-economy token, and it wins the attn slug over a smaller sibling ("attn markets"). The mint H1kXUqEPkQNNeNjGNN5tuHf3nsQK2vB1jUA9c4RggpUf is what our scan tracks: $1.5 million market cap, $78 thousand of liquidity and 972 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: attention-marketplace tokens price on the meta they are literally named for — fitting, if circular. The holder count is concentrated, the pool is functional, and the sibling ATTN exists to catch exactly the buyers who do not check the mint. The contract above is the slug winner.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 143 or ATTN?
By tracked market cap: 143 (Monad) measures $41.30K and ATTN (Solana) measures $1.49M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 143 or ATTN?
On the contract checks we publish: 143 (Monad) grades A and ATTN (Solana) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 143 and ATTN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 143 at −14.4% and ATTN at −24.3%.
More comparisons
CUM vs 143AQUARIUS vs 143OIL vs 143WEETH vs 143IMG vs ATTNBRK.BX vs ATTNATTN vs RIFTATTN vs SOSO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.