HostZRO vs MAGIC — price, size and safety, side by side
ZRO (Base) vs MAGIC (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
ZRO vs MAGIC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| ZRO | MAGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.63 | $0.05171 |
| Market cap | $436.89M | $17.46M |
| 24h volume | $911.98K | $15.81K |
| Liquidity | $291.89K | $131.05K |
| FDV | $7.53M | $16.24M |
| Holders | 448,942 | 408,713 |
| Age (days) | 158 | 900 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ZRO measures ~25× the market cap of MAGIC
- ZRO measures ~2.2× the liquidity of MAGIC
- ZRO measures ~58× the 24h volume of MAGIC
- over the shared window ZRO moved +31.8% while MAGIC moved +8.36%
What the data says
ZRO
ZRO at 0x6985884c4392d348587b19cb9eaaf157f13271cd — LayerZero — is the Base deployment, 158 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot and carrying a byte-identical address to the Optimism one — the same omnichain contract deployed deterministically on each chain. The asset-wide $436.9 million market cap towers over the $7.5 million fully-diluted figure on 6.1 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline but the tape is the liveliest of the ZRO books: $291.9 thousand of tracked depth on $912.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — turnover three times the pool daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
MAGIC
MAGIC at 0x539bde0d7dbd336b79148aa742883198bbf60342 is the Arbitrum-native currency of the Treasure gaming ecosystem — the token that denominates its marketplace and underpins its chain. The September 27, 2026 snapshot counts 408,713 holders around a $17.5 million market cap, the local supply of 313.9 million units reading $16.2 million fully diluted.
Two measured facts carry the read. The contract is an upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can be swapped after deployment, the standard shape for a managed ecosystem token and a measured fact here, not a rumor. And tracked depth of $131.1 thousand is thin against the cap, on $16.0 thousand of daily volume — this is an asset whose trading happens across venues, not in one deep pool. The ten largest wallets hold 66.0% of supply, which on an ecosystem token usually means treasury and bridge contracts rather than free-floating whales.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZRO or MAGIC?
By tracked market cap: ZRO (Base) measures $436.89M and MAGIC (Arbitrum) measures $17.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZRO or MAGIC?
On the contract checks we publish: ZRO (Base) grades A and MAGIC (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZRO and MAGIC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ZRO at +31.8% and MAGIC at +8.36%.
More comparisons
MIL vs ZROGRASS vs ZROZRO vs USAPURPE vs ZRONST vs MAGICGOR vs MAGICMAGIC vs GBACKMAGIC vs PONS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.