HostZBCN vs DUMP — price, size and safety, side by side
ZBCN (Solana) vs DUMP (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ZBCN vs DUMP — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| ZBCN | DUMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0021 | $0.000404 |
| Market cap | $211.08M | $153.71K |
| 24h volume | $428.22K | $1.60K |
| Liquidity | $79.15K | $79.06K |
| FDV | $211.08M | $153.71K |
| Holders | 109,980 | 5,874 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZBCN measures ~1,373× the market cap of DUMP
- ZBCN measures ~268× the 24h volume of DUMP
- ZBCN measures ~19× the holder count of DUMP
- over the shared window ZBCN moved +18.1% while DUMP moved −11.0%
What the data says
ZBCN
ZBCN is Zebec Network's token — the payments-streaming protocol's 2024 relaunch of its earlier ZBC asset — and it presents a specific tension in the September 26, 2026 snapshot: roughly $211 million of market capitalization carried by about $79 thousand of tracked on-chain liquidity, across 109,980 holders on mint ZBCNpuD7YMXzTHB2fhGkGi78MNsHGLRXUhRewNRm9RU.
Take the structure first, because it is unambiguous: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, both confirmed. Nothing in the contract can dilute holders or freeze a sale. On the mechanics this format grades, ZBCN is clean, and the 85/100 reflects a single deduction.
DUMP
DUMPSTR — mint 9bmvoZZphKMmNxVbQ2q8AwvHRwENAYcYMTSK39jaCHDa — carries a link worth pausing on: the recorded X handle is CyberKongz, the established NFT project — whether as issuer, partner, or listed social, the record doesn't say, but it's real provenance-adjacent signal rather than nothing. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $154 thousand across 5,874 holders, dumpstr.party live.
The flag that matters: freeze authority revoked but mint not flagged — a live mint on a 398-million-unit supply. On a CyberKongz-adjacent community token a live mint could be a designed emission feature; on an anonymous contract it would be a red flag. The name alone can't settle which — the mint state is the check.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZBCN or DUMP?
By tracked market cap: ZBCN (Solana) measures $211.08M and DUMP (Solana) measures $153.71K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZBCN or DUMP?
On the contract checks we publish: ZBCN (Solana) grades A and DUMP (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZBCN and DUMP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show ZBCN at +18.1% and DUMP at −11.0%.
More comparisons
IMX vs ZBCNPM vs ZBCNSLX vs ZBCNZBCN vs WHALESDUMP vs WHALESIMX vs DUMPPM vs DUMPSLX vs DUMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.