HostIMX vs DUMP — price, size and safety, side by side
IMX (Ethereum) vs DUMP (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
IMX vs DUMP — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| IMX | DUMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1688 | $0.000404 |
| Market cap | $148.45M | $153.71K |
| 24h volume | $13.15K | $1.60K |
| Liquidity | $79.27K | $79.06K |
| FDV | $337.58M | $153.71K |
| Holders | 96,984 | 5,874 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- IMX measures ~966× the market cap of DUMP
- IMX measures ~8.2× the 24h volume of DUMP
- IMX measures ~17× the holder count of DUMP
What the data says
IMX
IMX has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now IMX's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. That's what's holding the score at 67/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Looking at the market data, IMX shows thin liquidity of $79.27K and 96,984 holders as of 2026-09-27. The number worth sitting with is that $79.27K of depth against a market cap of about $148.45M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IMX reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 96,984-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IMX as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
DUMP
DUMPSTR — mint 9bmvoZZphKMmNxVbQ2q8AwvHRwENAYcYMTSK39jaCHDa — carries a link worth pausing on: the recorded X handle is CyberKongz, the established NFT project — whether as issuer, partner, or listed social, the record doesn't say, but it's real provenance-adjacent signal rather than nothing. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $154 thousand across 5,874 holders, dumpstr.party live.
The flag that matters: freeze authority revoked but mint not flagged — a live mint on a 398-million-unit supply. On a CyberKongz-adjacent community token a live mint could be a designed emission feature; on an anonymous contract it would be a red flag. The name alone can't settle which — the mint state is the check.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IMX or DUMP?
By tracked market cap: IMX (Ethereum) measures $148.45M and DUMP (Solana) measures $153.71K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IMX or DUMP?
On the contract checks we publish: IMX (Ethereum) grades C and DUMP (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IMX and DUMP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show IMX at 0.00% and DUMP at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PM vs IMXIMX vs ZBCNSLX vs IMXIMX vs WHALESZBCN vs DUMPDUMP vs WHALESPM vs DUMPSLX vs DUMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.