HostZAMA vs IMX — price, size and safety, side by side
ZAMA (BNB Chain) vs IMX (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ZAMA vs IMX — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| ZAMA | IMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.08418 | $0.1688 |
| Market cap | $245.37M | $148.45M |
| 24h volume | $7.04M | $13.15K |
| Liquidity | $313.10K | $79.27K |
| FDV | $22.90M | $337.58M |
| Holders | 3,540 | 96,984 |
| Age (days) | 234 | — |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~1.7× the market cap of IMX
- ZAMA measures ~3.9× the liquidity of IMX
- ZAMA measures ~536× the 24h volume of IMX
- IMX measures ~27× the holder count of ZAMA
What the data says
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
IMX
IMX has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now IMX's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. That's what's holding the score at 67/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Looking at the market data, IMX shows thin liquidity of $79.27K and 96,984 holders as of 2026-09-27. The number worth sitting with is that $79.27K of depth against a market cap of about $148.45M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IMX reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 96,984-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IMX as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZAMA or IMX?
By tracked market cap: ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M and IMX (Ethereum) measures $148.45M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZAMA or IMX?
On the contract checks we publish: ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A and IMX (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZAMA and IMX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show ZAMA at 0.00% and IMX at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSOPM vs IMXIMX vs ZBCNSLX vs IMXIMX vs DUMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.