HostZAMA vs FLUID — price, size and safety, side by side
ZAMA (BNB Chain) vs FLUID (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
ZAMA vs FLUID — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| ZAMA | FLUID | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.09075 | $1.36 |
| Market cap | $245.37M | $119.01M |
| 24h volume | $7.04M | $3.11M |
| Liquidity | $313.10K | $474.84K |
| FDV | $22.90M | $142.19M |
| Holders | 3,540 | 11,748 |
| Age (days) | 234 | 1,699 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~2.1× the market cap of FLUID
- FLUID measures ~1.5× the liquidity of ZAMA
- ZAMA measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of FLUID
- FLUID measures ~3.3× the holder count of ZAMA
- over the shared window ZAMA moved −9.55% while FLUID moved +6.93%
What the data says
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FLUID
FLUID is the token of Fluid — the DEX-and-lending protocol built by the Instadapp team, one of Ethereum DeFi's longest-running builders. The contract 0x6f40d4a6237c257fff2db00fa0510deeecd303eb is what our scan tracks: $475 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: Fluid is a working protocol with real lending and DEX volume, and the token is a governance-and-value-accrual claim on that activity — a cleaner fundamental story than most of the corpus carries. The caution is the usual one for mid-cap DeFi: liquidity on public pools is modest relative to the fully-diluted supply, and the token trades on sector sentiment at least as much as on protocol metrics.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZAMA or FLUID?
By tracked market cap: ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M and FLUID (Ethereum) measures $119.01M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZAMA or FLUID?
On the contract checks we publish: ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A and FLUID (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZAMA and FLUID performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ZAMA at −9.55% and FLUID at +6.93%.
More comparisons
GM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSOAUDIO vs FLUIDARX vs FLUIDFLUID vs CHIPFLUID vs METAC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.