HostWMON vs MPLX — price, size and safety, side by side
WMON (Monad) vs MPLX (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WMON vs MPLX — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| WMON | MPLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02663 | $0.05722 |
| Market cap | $10.13M | $29.10M |
| 24h volume | $1.76M | $2.57M |
| Liquidity | $2.34M | $2.29M |
| FDV | $8.90M | $61.74M |
| Holders | 90,710 | 24,976 |
| Age (days) | 301 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MPLX measures ~2.9× the market cap of WMON
- WMON measures ~3.6× the holder count of MPLX
- over the shared window WMON moved +23.9% while MPLX moved +78.8%
What the data says
WMON
WMON is wrapped MON — the ERC-20 form of Monad's native token that pools and routers actually compose, the same pattern as WETH on every other chain. The deployment 0x3bd359c1119da7da1d913d1c4d2b7c461115433a is Monad's canonical wrapper; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $2.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest wrapper note: WMON is mechanically the simplest claim in this index — a 1:1 deposit receipt for native MON issued by the canonical wrapper contract, with no custody between the holder and the asset beyond the wrapper contract itself. The asset's value is Monad's adoption; the wrapper is just plumbing.
MPLX
MPLX is Metaplex's token — and Metaplex is closer to public infrastructure than a project: the token-metadata standard, Candy Machine launches, and compressed-NFT tooling that most Solana assets were minted through. The mint METAewgxyPbgwsseH8T16a39CQ5VyVxZi9zXiDPY18m is the canonical deployment; our September 26, 2026 read shows $29.1 million market cap ($61.7 million fully diluted), $2.3 million of pool liquidity, 24,976 holders.
The honest read: Metaplex is everywhere underneath Solana — which is precisely why the token question is harder than the protocol question. Ubiquity as infrastructure does not automatically accrue to a token; the bet is on MPLX's capture mechanisms (protocol fees, tooling demand) maturing. Wide holder distribution and real usage are the strengths; thin protocol-token linkage is the caveat.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WMON or MPLX?
By tracked market cap: WMON (Monad) measures $10.13M and MPLX (Solana) measures $29.10M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WMON or MPLX?
On the contract checks we publish: WMON (Monad) grades A and MPLX (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WMON and MPLX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show WMON at +23.9% and MPLX at +78.8%.
More comparisons
SPCXX vs WMONMELANIA vs WMONCBBTC vs WMONMETAV vs WMONMPLX vs WBTCSPCXX vs MPLXMPLX vs TIBBIRMPLX vs ANSEM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.