HostMPLX vs ANSEM — price, size and safety, side by side
MPLX (Solana) vs ANSEM (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
MPLX vs ANSEM — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| MPLX | ANSEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05722 | $0.1706 |
| Market cap | $29.10M | $172.32M |
| 24h volume | $2.57M | $8.14M |
| Liquidity | $2.29M | $2.21M |
| FDV | $61.74M | $172.32M |
| Holders | 24,976 | 140,648 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ANSEM measures ~5.9× the market cap of MPLX
- ANSEM measures ~3.2× the 24h volume of MPLX
- ANSEM measures ~5.6× the holder count of MPLX
- over the shared window MPLX moved +77.2% while ANSEM moved −1.85%
What the data says
MPLX
MPLX is Metaplex's token — and Metaplex is closer to public infrastructure than a project: the token-metadata standard, Candy Machine launches, and compressed-NFT tooling that most Solana assets were minted through. The mint METAewgxyPbgwsseH8T16a39CQ5VyVxZi9zXiDPY18m is the canonical deployment; our September 26, 2026 read shows $29.1 million market cap ($61.7 million fully diluted), $2.3 million of pool liquidity, 24,976 holders.
The honest read: Metaplex is everywhere underneath Solana — which is precisely why the token question is harder than the protocol question. Ubiquity as infrastructure does not automatically accrue to a token; the bet is on MPLX's capture mechanisms (protocol fees, tooling demand) maturing. Wide holder distribution and real usage are the strengths; thin protocol-token linkage is the caveat.
ANSEM
ANSEM — "The Black Bull" — is a pump.fun-born token whose ticker trades on the name of one of crypto Twitter's best-known traders. The September 26, 2026 snapshot puts it at roughly $172 million of market capitalization with 140,648 holders on mint 9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump. This page grades the chain, and takes no position on any endorsement the name might imply — verify that question outside the chart, because a ticker is not an affiliation.
What the chain does certify is clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, and the creator wallet holding under 0.01% of supply in the snapshot. Fixed supply, no freeze lever, no deployer overhang — the three structural traps are all closed, which is the substance of the 100/100.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MPLX or ANSEM?
By tracked market cap: MPLX (Solana) measures $29.10M and ANSEM (Solana) measures $172.32M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MPLX or ANSEM?
On the contract checks we publish: MPLX (Solana) grades A and ANSEM (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MPLX and ANSEM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show MPLX at +77.2% and ANSEM at −1.85%.
More comparisons
MPLX vs WBTCWMON vs MPLXSPCXX vs MPLXMPLX vs TIBBIRANSEM vs PIPPINANSEM vs RNTTIBBIR vs ANSEMANSEM vs VIRTUAL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.