HostWLD vs OPUS — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Optimism) vs OPUS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WLD vs OPUS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WLD | OPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5355 | $0.0008282 |
| Market cap | $1.99B | $854.62K |
| 24h volume | $61.51K | $252.98 |
| Liquidity | $122.71K | $122.62K |
| FDV | $226.15M | $854.62K |
| Holders | 1,284,272 | 682 |
| Age (days) | 811 | — |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~2,329× the market cap of OPUS
- WLD measures ~243× the 24h volume of OPUS
- WLD measures ~1,883× the holder count of OPUS
- over the shared window WLD moved +19.0% while OPUS moved −30.9%
What the data says
WLD
WLD on Optimism at 0xdc6ff44d5d932cbd77b52e5612ba0529dc6226f1 is the bridged form of Worldcoin's token — the asset behind the orb-verified World ID network — and the September 27, 2026 snapshot hands it a D grade for reasons worth reading rather than guessing.
The flags are measured, not rumored. Minting is still possible on this contract — new supply can be minted — and the owner retains the ability to change balances. Freeze authority is revoked; that is the one lever the code lacks. Powers like these are the standard anatomy of a bridge-issued layer-two token — the bridge has to be able to issue the claim — but they sit on the contract either way. 1,284,272 wallets hold it on Optimism with the ten largest wallets at 72.7% of supply, and the thin end is the exit: $122.7 thousand of tracked pool depth against a $2.0 billion asset-wide cap, with $41.6 thousand changing hands in a day.
OPUS
Opus Genesis — OPUS — a Solana AI-agent token from the agent-wave generation (an agent-persona project), at mint Dxg9cLvssqb1WEMpyynjf17kGRc4UTNyUqjzNj99opus. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $123 thousand of liquidity and roughly 682 holders.
The honest number here is 682 holders — a narrow registry under a $123 thousand pool means concentration: a small set of wallets effectively sets the price. Agent-persona economics are attention economics with a product skin.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or OPUS?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Optimism) measures $1.99B and OPUS (Solana) measures $854.62K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or OPUS?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Optimism) grades D and OPUS (Solana) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and OPUS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WLD at +19.0% and OPUS at −30.9%.
More comparisons
AURY vs WLDPOL vs WLDWLD vs PERPSPADWLD vs SCAMAURY vs OPUSPOL vs OPUSOPUS vs PERPSPADOPUS vs SCAM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.