HostOPUS vs SCAM — price, size and safety, side by side
OPUS (Solana) vs SCAM (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
OPUS vs SCAM — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| OPUS | SCAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0008282 | $0.004156 |
| Market cap | $854.62K | $4.10M |
| 24h volume | $252.98 | $2.32K |
| Liquidity | $122.62K | $121.85K |
| FDV | $854.62K | $4.10M |
| Holders | 682 | 2,413 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- SCAM measures ~4.8× the market cap of OPUS
- SCAM measures ~9.2× the 24h volume of OPUS
- SCAM measures ~3.5× the holder count of OPUS
- over the shared window OPUS moved −28.6% while SCAM moved +63.4%
What the data says
OPUS
Opus Genesis — OPUS — a Solana AI-agent token from the agent-wave generation (an agent-persona project), at mint Dxg9cLvssqb1WEMpyynjf17kGRc4UTNyUqjzNj99opus. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $123 thousand of liquidity and roughly 682 holders.
The honest number here is 682 holders — a narrow registry under a $123 thousand pool means concentration: a small set of wallets effectively sets the price. Agent-persona economics are attention economics with a product skin.
SCAM
SCAM — Scamcoin — is a Solana meme whose brand is the joke in the name: a token that calls itself a scam as its entire marketing. The mint 9mNjA6BizTwpvd4DS3o7BjwZ6aPM9DC2jLHS7JFGbonk is what our scan tracks: $4.1 million market cap, $122 thousand of liquidity and 2,413 holders as of September 26, 2026 — and it wins the scam slug over a smaller sibling named "Scam Altman".
The honest read: irony is a marketing strategy, not a disclaimer — a coin that says it is a scam is still priced on attention and community like every other meme. The brand has kept a real pool and a real holder base alive longer than most straightforward scams, which is either the joke working or the joke being true; the mint above is the only way to tell which asset you hold.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OPUS or SCAM?
By tracked market cap: OPUS (Solana) measures $854.62K and SCAM (Solana) measures $4.10M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OPUS or SCAM?
On the contract checks we publish: OPUS (Solana) grades B and SCAM (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OPUS and SCAM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show OPUS at −28.6% and SCAM at +63.4%.
More comparisons
WLD vs OPUSAURY vs OPUSPOL vs OPUSOPUS vs PERPSPADSCAM vs RAGEGUYPERPSPAD vs SCAMSCAM vs GRNDSCAM vs HARAMBE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.