HostWLD vs MOOBIFI — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Optimism) vs MOOBIFI (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
WLD vs MOOBIFI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WLD | MOOBIFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5355 | $102.41 |
| Market cap | $1.99B | $1.21M |
| 24h volume | $61.51K | $4.55K |
| Liquidity | $122.71K | $110.40K |
| FDV | $226.15M | $1.24M |
| Holders | 1,284,272 | 15,538 |
| Age (days) | 811 | 1,063 |
| Safety grade | D | C |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~1,639× the market cap of MOOBIFI
- WLD measures ~14× the 24h volume of MOOBIFI
- WLD measures ~83× the holder count of MOOBIFI
- over the shared window WLD moved +20.1% while MOOBIFI moved 0.00%
What the data says
WLD
WLD on Optimism at 0xdc6ff44d5d932cbd77b52e5612ba0529dc6226f1 is the bridged form of Worldcoin's token — the asset behind the orb-verified World ID network — and the September 27, 2026 snapshot hands it a D grade for reasons worth reading rather than guessing.
The flags are measured, not rumored. Minting is still possible on this contract — new supply can be minted — and the owner retains the ability to change balances. Freeze authority is revoked; that is the one lever the code lacks. Powers like these are the standard anatomy of a bridge-issued layer-two token — the bridge has to be able to issue the claim — but they sit on the contract either way. 1,284,272 wallets hold it on Optimism with the ten largest wallets at 72.7% of supply, and the thin end is the exit: $122.7 thousand of tracked pool depth against a $2.0 billion asset-wide cap, with $41.6 thousand changing hands in a day.
MOOBIFI
MOOBIFI is Beefy Finance's yield-bearing BIFI wrapper on Optimism — a "mooToken" receipt for BIFI deposited in the protocol's vault — at 0xc55e93c62874d8100dbd2dfe307edc1036ad5434, 1,063 days into its life on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A yield receipt inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the vault strategy underneath it. The measured side is quiet — a $1.2 million market cap against $110.4 thousand of tracked liquidity and $4.6 thousand of daily volume — a vault receipt that mostly changes hands through mint-and-burn rather than pool flow. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or MOOBIFI?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Optimism) measures $1.99B and MOOBIFI (Optimism) measures $1.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or MOOBIFI?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Optimism) grades D and MOOBIFI (Optimism) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and MOOBIFI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WLD at +20.1% and MOOBIFI at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WLD vs OPUSAURY vs WLDPOL vs WLDWLD vs PERPSPADSPACEX vs MOOBIFIPOS vs MOOBIFIMOOBIFI vs ROUTERMOOBIFI vs 牛马
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.