HostWLD vs IMX — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Ethereum) vs IMX (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WLD vs IMX — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| WLD | IMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5511 | $0.1688 |
| Market cap | $2.05B | $148.45M |
| 24h volume | $253.44K | $13.15K |
| Liquidity | $140.93K | $79.27K |
| FDV | $5.51B | $337.58M |
| Holders | 63,635 | 96,984 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~14× the market cap of IMX
- WLD measures ~1.8× the liquidity of IMX
- WLD measures ~19× the 24h volume of IMX
- IMX measures ~1.5× the holder count of WLD
What the data says
WLD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on WLD to flag. Right now WLD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why WLD is at C (67/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, WLD shows thin liquidity of $140.93K and a holder base of 63,635 as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $2.05B, that $140.93K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 63,635-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of WLD as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
IMX
IMX has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now IMX's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. That's what's holding the score at 67/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Looking at the market data, IMX shows thin liquidity of $79.27K and 96,984 holders as of 2026-09-27. The number worth sitting with is that $79.27K of depth against a market cap of about $148.45M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IMX reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 96,984-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IMX as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or IMX?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Ethereum) measures $2.05B and IMX (Ethereum) measures $148.45M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or IMX?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Ethereum) grades C and IMX (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and IMX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show WLD at 0.00% and IMX at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WLD vs BURNIE9QRI vs WLDWLD vs KETWLD vs AMDPM vs IMXIMX vs ZBCNSLX vs IMXIMX vs DUMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.